Different Traditions in the Qur’an: Wansbrough's Analysis of Shu'aib Story in The Qur’an, A Critical Study

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 . PhD Candidate of Qur’an and Hadith Sciences, Tarbiyat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Qur’an and Hadith Sciences, Tarbiyat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Qur’an and Hadith Sciences, Tarbiyat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran;

4 Associate Professor, Research Center of Humanities and Cultural Studies;

Abstract

According to Wansbrough, the text of the Qur'an came into existence out of short, separate units that have been developed and put together in a gradual process. Based on this assumption, the purpose of literary analysis of the text of the Qur'an is to identify these independent units, which Wansbrough calls prophetic logia, and to study their related forms and the historical stages of their development. Accordingly, he analyzes the different versions of Shu'aib's story in the Qur'an and considers the different versions of this narrative to suggest the preexistence of different and independent traditions incorporated into the Qur’anic text. This difference, in his view, is such that it takes more than just a single generation to emerge. Thus, he counts it as evidence for the late canonization of the final text of the Qur'an at the end of the second century. This article explains and evaluates Wansbrough's literary analysis of related verses of the Shu'aib’s story in the Qur'an and its results.

Keywords

References

  1.  

    1. قرآن کریم.
    2. کتاب مقدس.
    3. نیلساز، نصرت، خاورشناسان و ابن عباس، تهران، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی، 1393.
    4. نجارزادگان، فاطمه؛ نجارزادگان، فتح‌الله، ارزیابی دیدگاه ونزبرو در باب بیانات پیامبرانه در کتاب مطالعات قرآنی، نشریۀ پژوهش­های قرآن و حدیث، شمارۀ 1، سال پنجاه و سوم، بهار و تابستان 1399.
    5. موحد، ضیاء، از ارسطو تا گودل، چاپ چهارم، تهران، هرمس، 1392.
    6. 6. حلی، حسن بن یوسف‌، الجوهر النضید فی شرح منطق التجرید، چاپ پنجم، قم، انتشارات بیدار، 1371.
    7. Adams, Charles J., 1997, Reflections On the Work of John Wansbrough, Method & Theory in The Study of Religion, Vol. 9, No. 1, Pp. 75-90.
    8. Berg Herbert, 1997, Implications of and Opposition to The Methods and Theories of John Wansbrough, Within Method and Theory in The Study Of Religion, Walter De Gruyter, Berlin.
    9. Buss, Martin J, 1999, Biblical Form Criticism in Its Context, Sheffield Academic Press.
    10. Easton, Burton Scott, 1928, The Gospel Before the Gospels, New York, C. Scribner's Sons.
    11. Fazlur Rahman, 1994, Major Themes of the Qur'ān.
    12. Fürst Walter, 1995, Heilsgeschichte, In: Lexikon Für Theologie Und Kirche Ed. Walter Kasper, Herder.
    13. Graham, William A., 1980, Review of Quranic Studies: Sources of Scriptural Interpretation by John Wansbrough, Journal of The American Oriental Society, Vol. 100, No. 2, Pp. 137-141.
    14. Koch, Klaus, The Growth of the Biblical Tradition, London, I 969.
    15. Motzki, Harald, 2005, Dating Muslim Traditions: A Survey, Arabica, 52; 2, 204-253.
    16. Pier, John, 2016, The Configuration of Narrative Sequences, In: Raphaël Baroni and Françoise Revaz (Eds.), Narrative Sequence in Contemporary Narratology, Ohio State University Press.
    17. Prince, Gerald, 2016, On Narrative Sequence, Classical and Postclassical, In: Raphaël Baroni and Françoise Revaz (Eds.), Narrative Sequence in Contemporary Narratology, Ohio State University Press.
    18. Rippin, Andrew, 1958, Literary Analysis of Qurāʾn, Tafsīr, And Sīra: The Methodologies of John Wansbrough, In: R.C. Martin (Ed.), Approaches to Islam in Its Religious Studies, University of Arizona Press.
    19. Schoeler, Gregor, The Codification of the Qurʾan: A Comment On the Hypotheses of Burton and Wansbrough, In: The Qurʾān in Context: Historical and Literary Investigations into The Qurʾānic Milieu, Ed. Angelika Neuwirth, Nicholas Sinai, And Michael Marx (Leiden: Brill, 2010), 779–94.
    20. Stewart, Devin J., 2016, Wansbrough Bultmann and The Theory Of Variant Traditions In The Qurʾān, In: Angelika Neuwirth And Michael A. Sells (Eds.), Qurʾānic Studies Today, Routledge.
    21. Wansbrough John, 2004, Quranic Studies, Foreword, Translations and Expanded Notes by Andrew Rlppin, Prometheus Books, New York Berg.
    22. Welch, Alfred T, 2000, Formulaic Features Punishment Stories, Within LITERARY STRUCTURES OF RELIGIOUS MEANING IN THE QUR'AN.
    23. Zwettler, Michael, 2007, The Sura of the Poets: Final Conclusions? Journal of Arabic Literature 38.2: 111–166.
Quranic Sciences and Tradition
Volume 55, Issue 2
March 2023
Pages 552-529

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics